2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11573-014-0718-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using tri-reference point theory to evaluate risk attitude and the effects of financial incentives in a gamified crowdsourcing task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk-taking aptitude is different from investor to investor. Generally, the investors are categorised into three on the basis of their risk-taking abilities (Harris and Wu 2014). They can be risk averse, risk neutral and risk seeking.…”
Section: Risk-taking Abilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk-taking aptitude is different from investor to investor. Generally, the investors are categorised into three on the basis of their risk-taking abilities (Harris and Wu 2014). They can be risk averse, risk neutral and risk seeking.…”
Section: Risk-taking Abilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, managing dependencies between tasks and sub-tasks drives the ability to coordinate large-scale tasks and improves the completion and acceptance rates of such tasks (Chen et al, 2014). Incentive management, meanwhile, manages the dependencies between workers' performance and different types of rewards available to them (Harris and Wu, 2014). For example, high pricing of tasks lowers the output for the job provider due to budgetary constraints.…”
Section: Coordination System Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree to which crowdwork platform governance manages the interdependencies between worker's performance and the incentives and rewards available to them (Harris and Wu, 2014).…”
Section: Incentive Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefiting from the foundational theories of their predecessors, Wang and Johnson (2012) propose trireference point (TRP) theory with minimum requirement (MR), status quo (SQ), and goal (G) as the reference points for decision makers, which is the theoretical tool that this paper emphasizes. Although TRP theory is a recent innovation, it has been widely used in various areas related to decision-making management, such as gamified crowdsourcing tasks (Harris & Wu, 2014), salary perception (Zhao et al,208), HR management (Hu & Wang, 2014), food choice (Lagerkvist et al, 2015), and even international second home retirement motives in Malaysia (Keemun & Musa, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the constraints of formulas(8) and(9), the positions of particles are randomly initialized, and the velocities of the particles are randomly initialized in the interval (-0.05, 0.05). If the initial solution does not satisfy constraint (5), it is reinitialized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%