2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Ultrasonography to Assess the Effectiveness of Cricoid Pressure on Esophageal Compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits, and indeed the efficacy of rapid sequence induction have been previously questioned, scrutinised and debated . Several studies have specifically assessed the efficacy of this manoeuvre to occlude the oesophageal entrance .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits, and indeed the efficacy of rapid sequence induction have been previously questioned, scrutinised and debated . Several studies have specifically assessed the efficacy of this manoeuvre to occlude the oesophageal entrance .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not know the exact position of the catheter in the lumen, therefore it is unknown whether the detected pressures are representative of parts of the esophagus not in contact with the catheter. Previous studies have also shown that the esophagus is lateralized during cricoid pressure, making the occlusion less likely, although the presence of a high‐pressure zone covering the lateralized esophagus makes this objection less relevant. Additionally, some parts of the proximal limit of the high pressure zone during cricoid pressure are missing in the analysis for some subjects, since an analysis of the UES was not the primary aim of the original study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classically, cricoid pressure has been used to prevent gastric regurgitation in unresponsive patients with an unsecured airway, yet in recent years the benefit of cricoid pressure has been called into question [[9], [10], [11], [12], [13]]. In 2017, Kei et al showed that cricoid pressure could not prevent liquid from entering the esophagus [3]. In addition to having questionable efficacy, cricoid pressure is also associated with certain negative outcomes, such as cricoid cartilage fracture [11], airway obstruction [12], or an impaired laryngeal view during intubation [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, attention has been drawn to the use of ultrasound in airway assessment and management. For example, Kei et al utilized POCUS to visualize the passage of carbonated beverages in the esophagus of healthy volunteers both during and without cricoid pressure, showing that cricoid pressure did not prevent passage of liquid [3]. Additionally, Bouvet et al demonstrated that POCUS can identify air in the stomach during facemask ventilation of anesthetized patients in an operating room [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%