Using VEGNET In-Situ Monitoring LiDAR (IML) to Capture Dynamics of Plant Area Index, Structure and Phenology in Aspen Parkland Forests in Alberta, Canada

Abstract

Abstract:The use of ceptometers and digital hemispherical photographs to estimate Plant Area Index (PAI) often include biases and errors from instrument positioning, orientation and data analysis. As an alternative to these methods, we used an In-Situ Monitoring LiDAR system that provides indirect measures of PAI and Plant Area Volume Density (PAVD) at a fixed angle, based on optimized principles and algorithms for PAI retrieval. The instrument was installed for 22 nights continuously from September 26 to October 17, 2013 during leaf-fall in an Aspen Parkland Forest. A total of 85 scans were performed (~4 scans per night). PAI measured decreased from 1.27 to 0.67 during leaf-fall, which is consistent with values reported in the literature. PAVD profiles allowed differentiating the contribution of PAI per forest strata. Phenological changes were captured in four ways: number of hits, maximum cumulative and absolute PAI values, time series of PAVD profiles and PAI values per forest strata. We also found that VEGNET IML Canopy PAI and MODIS LAI values showed a similar decreasing trend and differed by 2%-15%. Our results indicate that the VEGNET IML has great potential for rapid forest structural characterization and for ground validation of PAI/LAI at a temporal frequency compatible with earth observation satellites. OPEN ACCESSForests 2014, 5 1054

Reliability and limitations of a novel terrestrial laser scanner for daily monitoring of forest canopy dynamics

“…Previous studies confirmed that lidar data are affected by rain (through refraction or reflection of the laser beam by moisture on the external surface of the scan head prism), and by wind (through random displacement of tree branches and leaves; Culvenor et al, 2014;Portillo-Quintero et al, 2014). Single rain-affected scans can be removed if accurate weather data are available (Portillo-Quintero et al, 2014).…”

Can terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) and hemispherical photographs predict tropical dry forest succession with liana abundance?

“…The VEGNET is a TLS that automatically scans a forest plot and produces a vertical foliage density profile. Given its automated mode of operation and semipermanent installation, the VEGNET instrument is described as an in situ monitoring lidar (IML) (Culvernor et al, 2014;Portillo-Quintero et al, 2014).…”

Reflecting conifer phenology using mobile terrestrial LiDAR: A case study of Pinus sylvestris growing under the Mediterranean climate in Perth, Australia

“…For fine-scale tree structure representation, static terrestrial LiDAR (also referred to as static terrestrial laser scanning, TLS) mostly capable of characterizing structure details, such as vegetation density profiles (Ashcroft et al, 2014), was attempted to quantify and monitor ecosystem structural dynamics (Eitel et al, 2013). Portillo-Quintero et al (2014) utilized a TLS system to in-situ measure the dynamics of phenology. Calders et al (2015) operated spring phenology monitoring by manipulating high temporal resolution TLS measurements.…”