2012
DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2012.666869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using vulnerability performance indicators to attain food supply chain robustness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Definitions of robustness focus on the ability to continue with operations (Stonebraker, Goldhar & Nassos, 2009) while resisting the impact of supply chain disruptions. It has been argued that supply chain robustness has yet to be clearly defined in the supply chain risk literature and remains misunderstood (Vlajic, van Lokven, Haijema & van der Vorst, 2012). In addition, further work, for example developing scales, is required (Natarajarathinam, Capar & Narayanan, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Development Supply Chain Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definitions of robustness focus on the ability to continue with operations (Stonebraker, Goldhar & Nassos, 2009) while resisting the impact of supply chain disruptions. It has been argued that supply chain robustness has yet to be clearly defined in the supply chain risk literature and remains misunderstood (Vlajic, van Lokven, Haijema & van der Vorst, 2012). In addition, further work, for example developing scales, is required (Natarajarathinam, Capar & Narayanan, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Development Supply Chain Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have highlighted a number of factors associated with the emergency distribution and logistics management through established supply chain networks. Complexities relating to: non-cooperation amongst stakeholders with vested interests, disrupted supply chain communication, poor logistics and inefficient distribution network, corruption, poor communication and lack of coordination amongst stakeholders (Diallo et al, 2017;Hussain & Uddin, 1995;Shareef et al, 2017;Su et al, 2008;Surana et al, 2005;Stevenson & Spring , 2009;Vlajic et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2011;Zheng et al, 2017). Many of these factors directly relate to the numerous problems inherent within the hilsa supply chain.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the supply chain management literature, robustness is considered as the ability of a supply chain to continue to function well even when faced with disturbances in its processes (Dong, 2006;Tang, 2006;Waters, 2007;Stonebraker et al, 2009;Weiland and Wallenburg, 2012;Vlajic et al 2013). Figure 1: Framework for achieving robust supply chains (adapted from Vlajic et al, 2012) Generally, to achieve robustness supply chains have to manage disturbances successfully.…”
Section: A Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of a particular redesign strategy depends on the characteristics of disturbances and its vulnerability sources (Vlajic et al, 2013). While the majority of papers in the supply chain risk management literature focuses on identification and analysis of risks and disturbances, as well as identification of appropriate or optimal redesign strategies that can be used when disturbances occur, there is little research devoted to opportunities and challenges of small and medium enterprises (SMEs)…”
Section: A Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation