“…Discriminating between these various types of events is of significant scientific and societal importance. For example, event discrimination has been a major scientific endeavor in nuclear explosion monitoring (e.g., Fisk, ; Hartse et al, ; He et al, ; Kim et al, ; Kim et al, ; Richards & Kim, ; Schaff et al, ; Tian et al, ; Walter et al, ; Wang et al, ; Xie & Patton, ; Yao, Tian, Lu, et al, ; Yao, Tian, Sun, & Wen, ; Zhang & Wen, , ; Zhao et al, ); classifications of anthropogenic earthquake activities, such as those related to water impoundment of a reservoir (e.g., Do Nascimento et al, ; Ge et al, ; Gough & Gough, ; Guha, ), energy field production (e.g., Clarke et al, ; Guilhem et al, ; Hough & Page, ; Šílený et al, ; Tang et al, ), and waste water injection (e.g., Keranen et al, ; Langenbruch & Zoback, ), have attracted significant interests in the scientific community and the public; and in the seismic hazard analysis, identification of the seismic events that are unrelated to the tectonic process, such as quarry blasts (QBs) or IEs, is also necessary, as their presence in the seismic event catalog would lead to erroneous analyses of seismic hazard.…”