2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28374-2_43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Wavelet Transformation for Prediction CO2 in Smart Home Care Within IoT for Monitor Activities of Daily Living

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measured values of nonelectrical and electrical quantities in real time using implemented KNX technology in SH (presence of persons, power consumption, temperature, relative humidity, or CO 2 concentration) need to be preprocessed and adjusted for subsequent calculations using appropriate mathematical methods (classification [10,11], recognition [12][13][14], and prediction [15]) (the prediction was performed by the ANN-based on the scaled conjugate gradient (SCG), experimental results verified high method accuracy > 90%), [16] (the prediction was performed by the ANN Bayesian regulation method (BRM) with LMS AF additive noise canceling, best accuracy was better than 95%) [17] (the prediction was performed by decision tree regression method with the accuracy of 46.25 ppm). An important area of the described chain is the suppression of additive noise from the measured and calculated waveforms of monitored quantities [18,19]. The disadvantage of using an LMS adaptive filter in an additive noise suppression application is the slow startup of the filtering process in the initial phase, depending on the step size parameter set and the adaptive filter order.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measured values of nonelectrical and electrical quantities in real time using implemented KNX technology in SH (presence of persons, power consumption, temperature, relative humidity, or CO 2 concentration) need to be preprocessed and adjusted for subsequent calculations using appropriate mathematical methods (classification [10,11], recognition [12][13][14], and prediction [15]) (the prediction was performed by the ANN-based on the scaled conjugate gradient (SCG), experimental results verified high method accuracy > 90%), [16] (the prediction was performed by the ANN Bayesian regulation method (BRM) with LMS AF additive noise canceling, best accuracy was better than 95%) [17] (the prediction was performed by decision tree regression method with the accuracy of 46.25 ppm). An important area of the described chain is the suppression of additive noise from the measured and calculated waveforms of monitored quantities [18,19]. The disadvantage of using an LMS adaptive filter in an additive noise suppression application is the slow startup of the filtering process in the initial phase, depending on the step size parameter set and the adaptive filter order.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%