2007
DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Wireless Handheld Computers and Tailored Text Messaging to Reduce Negative Consequences of Drinking Alcohol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
119
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Behavioral interventions delivered via internet and cellular phone have demonstrated efficacy in smoking cessation, alcohol reduction, and weight loss. 4,5,[15][16][17][18][19][20] However, most of these studies have recruited college students and/or excluded those with low literacy. None, to our knowledge, have focused on urban, high-risk women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Behavioral interventions delivered via internet and cellular phone have demonstrated efficacy in smoking cessation, alcohol reduction, and weight loss. 4,5,[15][16][17][18][19][20] However, most of these studies have recruited college students and/or excluded those with low literacy. None, to our knowledge, have focused on urban, high-risk women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E-interventions appear to be superior to assessment-only (AO) control conditions on at least some measures of drinking behavior (Dimeff & McNeely, 2000;Lewis & Neighbors, 2007;Neighbors, Larimer, & Lewis, 2004;Neighbors et al 2006;Bersamin, Paschall, Fearnow-Kenney, & Wyrick, 2007;Walters, Vader, & Harris, 2007;Weitzel, Bernhardt, Usdan, Mays, & Glanz, 2007), though two studies did not find any beneficial effects relative to AO controls (Kypri & McAnally, 2005;Sharmer, 2001). Findings are mixed regarding the efficacy of e-interventions in comparison with purely educational interventions (e.g.…”
Section: Summary Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Another notable drawback to the mobile-based delivery of interventions is the lack of personal engagement with healthcare practitioners. However, empirical evidence supports the use of mobile-based interventions delivered as stand-alone interventions (Weitzel et al 2007; Agyapong et al 2012;Suffoletto et al 2012) or as an integrated component of a treatment protocol (Gonzales et al 2014;Gustafson et al 2014;Lucht et al 2014). Despite these limitations, this study provides valuable information for health practitioners looking for alternatives to costly BMIs that require resources many institutions do not have (Cowell et al 2012;Kazemi et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%