Usluga Namirenja Imovinskopravnog Zahteva

Abstract

The paper presents a continuation of the research on the problem of realization of compensation for damage caused by the commission of criminal offense. In the first paper created within the same project, the author laid the foundations of the problem, dealing with the theoretical notion of damage caused by a criminal offense, the notion of civil torts and tortious liability, and the distinction between the notion of damage and the consequence of a criminal offence. This time, the author will concentrate on settling the receivables for damages by presenting the entire path that one claim for damages should take. Namely, obtaining a property claim should occur primarily in criminal proceedings, but it is most often adjudicated in litigation because in most cases the subject entitled to it is referred to litigation in order to exercise his right to compensation. After the judgement in the civil procedure is rendered, which orders the defendant-convict in the criminal procedure to compensate the caused damage either by compensating the damage in money or by returning the thing, or by annulling a certain legal deal, the concrete execution of the verdict in the executive procedure begins. While studying the manner of collecting the claims of the entitled subject through all three different procedures for the damage caused by the commission of criminal offense, the author also deals with controversial issues that may arise (the issue of statute of limitations for property claim, the issue of subjects who may be holders of property claims, the adequacy of the procedure in which the property claim is exercised, the means of execution of a monetary claim for damages caused by the commission of criminal offense, etc.).