2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ustekinumab and vedolizumab for the prevention of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease: Results from the ENEIDA registry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Yamada et al published a retrospective study looking at vedolizumab in the post-operative setting, finding that at rates of clinical (Harvey–Bradshaw index ≤ 4) remission were similar between patients receiving vedolizumab or anti-TNFα therapy at 6–12 months of follow-up, whereas rates of endoscopic remission, defined by simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) of 0, was significantly decreased in patients receiving vedolizumab as compared with anti-TNFα therapy (25% vs 66%, P = 0.01) [ 77 ]. In a retrospective study looking at patients with CD receiving vedolizumab or ustekinumab after curative intestinal resection with ileocolonic anastomosis in the ENEIDA registry (Nationwide study on genetic and environmental determinants of inflammatory bowel disease) by GETECCU, authors found that 40% of patients on vedolizumab and 42% of patients on ustekinumab had post-operative endoscopic recurrence (defined by Rutgeerts score > i1, with endoscopy within 18 months post-surgery) [ 78 ]. These rates are similar to those reported with anti-TNFα agents, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yamada et al published a retrospective study looking at vedolizumab in the post-operative setting, finding that at rates of clinical (Harvey–Bradshaw index ≤ 4) remission were similar between patients receiving vedolizumab or anti-TNFα therapy at 6–12 months of follow-up, whereas rates of endoscopic remission, defined by simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) of 0, was significantly decreased in patients receiving vedolizumab as compared with anti-TNFα therapy (25% vs 66%, P = 0.01) [ 77 ]. In a retrospective study looking at patients with CD receiving vedolizumab or ustekinumab after curative intestinal resection with ileocolonic anastomosis in the ENEIDA registry (Nationwide study on genetic and environmental determinants of inflammatory bowel disease) by GETECCU, authors found that 40% of patients on vedolizumab and 42% of patients on ustekinumab had post-operative endoscopic recurrence (defined by Rutgeerts score > i1, with endoscopy within 18 months post-surgery) [ 78 ]. These rates are similar to those reported with anti-TNFα agents, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, another retrospective study including CD patients with a prevention strategy with Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab showed similar efficacy between the two therapies. The cumulative probability of clinical POR at 12 months after surgery was 32% and 30% for Ustekinumab and Vedolizumab, respectively [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, larger postoperative controlled trials are needed to establish the effectiveness of Vedolizumab on the rate of POR. Only a few data are available concerning the use of Vedolizumab for the prevention and treatment of POR, and only anecdotal experience or retrospective studies concerning its application in preventing POR [14][15][16]32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, surgery is not curative, and endoscopic recurrence at the anastomotic site occurs in up to 70% of patients in the first year after surgery, followed by clinical recurrence a few years later[ 2 ]. Postoperative management of these patients is crucial to identify those at highest risk of recurrence to begin rapid prophylactic treatments targeting mainly tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα)[ 3 ], interleukins 12/23 and α4β7 integrins on leukocytes[ 4 ]. Given the high rate of recurrence after intestinal resection for CD and the cost and potential adverse effects of biologic therapies used in prophylaxis, there is a clear need to identify the mechanisms leading to postoperative recurrence (POR), to develop noninvasive methods predicting recurrence and to propose new evidence-based therapeutic strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%