2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2014.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilidad de la ecografía comparada con la capnografía y la radiografía en la intubación traqueal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the reported figures for diagnostic validity of UA-US for confirmation of ETT position, Alonso Quintela et al [9] reported that US appears to be as effective as capnography for identifying ETT and may be useful wherever capnography is less reliable as during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Thereafter, Das et al [17] reported that transtracheal US is a useful tool to confirm endotracheal intubation with sensitivity and specificity rates of 98% in both emergency and elective intubation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In line with the reported figures for diagnostic validity of UA-US for confirmation of ETT position, Alonso Quintela et al [9] reported that US appears to be as effective as capnography for identifying ETT and may be useful wherever capnography is less reliable as during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Thereafter, Das et al [17] reported that transtracheal US is a useful tool to confirm endotracheal intubation with sensitivity and specificity rates of 98% in both emergency and elective intubation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In line with these findings, Pfeiffer et al [24,25] documented that verification of ETT placement with US is as fast as auscultation alone and faster than the combination of auscultation and capnography, even in obese patients [23]. Thereafter, Alonso Quintela et al [9] reported despite US was slower than capnography for identifying ETT, US is as effective and quicker than X-ray for assessment of ETT insertion depth, and it may contribute to decrease the routine use of X-ray after tracheal intubation. Recently, Rajan et al [23] documented that US confirmation of ETT placement is superior in speed compared to auscultatory method.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[20] Lung sonography is considered more sensitive than traditional upright chest radiography in detecting pneumothorax and it allows a rapid bedside evaluation of an unstable patient. [21]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, only two previous studies have utilized ultrasound in real time for the confirmation of ETT position with comparison to standard-of-care methods [28, 29]. The first study included 16 NICU intubations and found a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 100% for ultrasound compared to capnography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%