2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2007.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilisation de lambeaux libres dans la reconstruction des membres inférieurs chez l’enfant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies reported free latissimus dorsi muscle flap survival rates of 100% in children, but the authors report only small series of patients (1-4 children). 5,6,8 In larger studies (5-12 children) a free latissimus dorsi muscle flap survival rate of 67 to 80% has been reported. 1,3,7,8 In our study we found one partial and three complete free-flap losses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies reported free latissimus dorsi muscle flap survival rates of 100% in children, but the authors report only small series of patients (1-4 children). 5,6,8 In larger studies (5-12 children) a free latissimus dorsi muscle flap survival rate of 67 to 80% has been reported. 1,3,7,8 In our study we found one partial and three complete free-flap losses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…5,6,8 In larger studies (5-12 children) a free latissimus dorsi muscle flap survival rate of 67 to 80% has been reported. 1,3,7,8 In our study we found one partial and three complete free-flap losses. The partial loss resulting from venous malperfusion underwent surgical revision in which the venous anastomosis was redone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flaps most often described for lower limb reconstruction are those of anterior serratus, rectus abdominis and latissimus dorsi 1,11,12 . The latissimus dorsi flap is one of the most widely used in microsurgery 13 , although it has the disadvantage of producing a functional deficit in the upper extremity, with loss of extension, adduction and internal rotation of the arm [14][15][16] , in addition to the esthetic alterations it causes at the donor site, such as the scar and thoracic silhouette shape change 17,18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%