Utilitarian and hedonic walking: examining the impact of the built environment on walking behavior

Abstract

Introduction: Most previous studies have mainly focused on utilitarian or recreational walking and discussed their relationship with the built environment. The point is that most of these studies have not been sensitive to the motivation of trips while travel is a complicated behavior and individuals may have different degrees of motivation and utility for a given trip purpose. Accordingly, because of different utilities of travel, it is more likely that the built environment differently affects walking behavior. Purpose: This paper aims to clearly distinguish between utilitarian and hedonic walking and then explores how the built environment influences walking behavior. Method: Using data collected from 863 respondents in six diverse neighborhoods in Isfahan, Iran, we developed negative binomial models for two types of walking; namely, utilitarian and hedonic walking. Results: The results reveal some interesting insights: first, both models of walking confirm that neighborhood preferences do not play any important role in explaining walking behavior in our context, inconsistent with previous studies. Second, the objective and perceived built environment factors differently contribute to explaining both types of walking. In this regard, utilitarian walking is affected by mixed land use, residential density, facility accessibility, attractiveness, and walking infrastructure; and hedonic walking is influenced by mixed land use, attractiveness and safety. Third, attitudinal factors and socio-demographic variables also differently appear in the models of walking. Conclusion: The results confirm that it is essential to be more sensitive to the motivation of trips, and suggest a clear policy implication: the individuals' reactions toward policies intended to increase walking frequency depend partly on the utility for walking.

Levels and Characteristics of Utilitarian Walking in the Central Areas of the Cities of Bologna and Porto

“…In this study, utilitarian walking was associated with various individual and geographic variables, confirming previous findings in this domain [57,74,75]. In our study, females were found to be more likely to walk than males.…”

Neighborhood Environments and Utilitarian Walking Among Older vs. Younger Rural Adults

“…In addition, perceived availability of sidewalks/shoulders (OR = 1.49, p = 0.098) which approached the significant level is relevant to pedestrian safety. This finding is consistent with previous studies reporting environmental factors associated with utilitarian walking in neighborhoods, in which safety has been one of the most frequently documented domains of correlates (9,40,41). Furthermore, older adults are more vulnerable to safety-related environmental challenges due to their functional and cognitive declines (28), and therefore providing safe and barrier-free environments may hold even greater importance to support their walking.…”

Prevalence and factors associated with pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries: case Finland

“…Additionally, the built environment has an effect on the amount of walking, through variables such as mixed land use, aesthetics and walking infrastructure (e.g. [6,35,42]).…”