2008
DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.4.873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilitarian relevance and face management in the interpretation of ambiguous question/request statements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an additional test, we also use the literature on face management to form expectations about the types of linguistic patterns we may observe in these open‐ended explanations if people are actually engaging in face saving (Demeure, Bonnefon, & Raufaste, ; Holtgraves, ). Specifically, people who save face are more likely to hedge, frame their preferences as being better for some anonymous other, qualify their explanations, and offer extraneous information.…”
Section: Experimental Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an additional test, we also use the literature on face management to form expectations about the types of linguistic patterns we may observe in these open‐ended explanations if people are actually engaging in face saving (Demeure, Bonnefon, & Raufaste, ; Holtgraves, ). Specifically, people who save face are more likely to hedge, frame their preferences as being better for some anonymous other, qualify their explanations, and offer extraneous information.…”
Section: Experimental Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a face-to-face setting where the subject (i.e., James) is also present, politeness concerns will usually lead to an even greater reluctance to express negative information. Empirical studies have shown that people are sensitive to pragmatic implications of these politeness concerns and adjust their understanding accordingly (e.g., Bonnefon, Feeney, & Villejoubert, 2009;Bonnefon & Villejoubert, 2006;Demeure, Bonnefon, & Raufaste, 2008, 2009Juanchich, Sirota, & Butler, 2012;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirectness, as expressed in so-called negative politeness (Brown & Levinson, 1978/1987, is identified as the most polite of these strategies. As highlighted in Demeure et al (2008), indirectness as a politeness strategy is intimately linked to the interpretation of ambiguous statements. Specifically, knowing that a speaker can use indirectness to soften a potentially face-threatening act should lead the listener to search for the most face-threatening interpretation of an ambiguous statement.…”
Section: Faceworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These power and distance variables have led to mixed results (Brown & Gilman, 1989;Demeure et al, 2008;Holtgraves, 1994;Holtgraves & Yang, 1990;Slugoski & Turnbull, 1988; see Spencer-Oatey, 1996 for a review). Our two experiments aim at investigating their effect in the context of the request/disagreement ambiguity.…”
Section: Faceworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation