2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility analysis of digital villages to empower balanced urban-rural development based on the three-stage DEA-Malmquist model

Abstract: Rural subjects, the agricultural industrial structure, public services and rural governance are fully empowered by digital villages. This empowerment effectively compensates for the urban-rural digital divide and promotes the equalization of urban-rural income, consumption, education, medical care, and governance. Based on the three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) model and Malmquist index, this article conducts an in-depth study of the static and dynamic efficiency trends of digital villages that empowe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, with respect to indicators, Chao et al evaluated the e-commerce labor, professional skills training, and the number of mobile phones per capita [ 55 ]. Furthermore, Zhang et al selected policy guidance, spatial compactness, and facility convenience as indicators [ 56 ], and Cao et al selected indicators such as digital infrastructure, local finance, the industrial structure, technological innovation, and educational level [ 57 ]. This study utilizes the level of digital village construction as the target layer; it utilizes institutions, human resources, and technology as sub-target layers; and it contains five criteria layers and 17 evaluation indicators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, with respect to indicators, Chao et al evaluated the e-commerce labor, professional skills training, and the number of mobile phones per capita [ 55 ]. Furthermore, Zhang et al selected policy guidance, spatial compactness, and facility convenience as indicators [ 56 ], and Cao et al selected indicators such as digital infrastructure, local finance, the industrial structure, technological innovation, and educational level [ 57 ]. This study utilizes the level of digital village construction as the target layer; it utilizes institutions, human resources, and technology as sub-target layers; and it contains five criteria layers and 17 evaluation indicators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, considering prior studies [7,10,26], we selected nine indicators from the three dimensions of digital infrastructure, industry digitisation, and digital services to constitute an index system for evaluating the level of digital village construction (Table 2). The reasons are as follows: (a) Digital infrastructure is the foundation of digital village construction.…”
Section: Definition Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Eq. ( 2), denotes the e ciency of health care services in city k in year t. [39][40][41] to reveal its dynamic evolution.…”
Section: Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%