2011
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a2716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility and Interobserver Agreement of Ultrasound Elastography in the Detection of Malignant Thyroid Nodules in Clinical Care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we tested the interobserver variability as well. We obtained good results, with a Cohen's k value of 0.755, which is consistent with the result of the study of Lim et al [22] (k = 0.77) and Merino et al [31] (k = 0.82) using different elastographic techniques.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, we tested the interobserver variability as well. We obtained good results, with a Cohen's k value of 0.755, which is consistent with the result of the study of Lim et al [22] (k = 0.77) and Merino et al [31] (k = 0.82) using different elastographic techniques.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, later studies using the four score scale reported little interobserver variability [46], with almost perfect interobserver agreement [17], better for RTE than for the TIRADS score [6]. Excellent interobserver agreement was also reported using a three score gray scale system [55]. Although most studies state that using the quality indicator while performing RTE aims to reduce variability, little is known about the actual figures for intraobserver variability of scoring, although at least one study reported acceptable intraobserver reproducibility [61].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Even the early reports noted that follicular carcinoma may appear elastic on RTE [27]. Today it is well documented that RTE is not useful in diagnosing this type of carcinoma [4,21,42,43,55] as it may produce up to 44% false negative results [9]. Medullary, nondifferentiated and metastatic carcinoma may also appear elastic [4,21].…”
Section: What Is the Influence Of The Nodule Size On The Diagnosis?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the development of elastographic methods (for examples the ones used for the assessment of thyroid nodules), interobserver variability proved to no longer be a drawback. Furthermore, the association of US examination with elastography has proven extremely useful for a better characterization of thyroid nodules [46][47][48]. Regarding endorectal elastography, there are still not enough studies to make firm statements.…”
Section: Gray Scale Us (2d 3d)mentioning
confidence: 99%