2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility and limitations of species richness metrics for conservation planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
169
1
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
2
169
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…(Fleishman et al 2006). Además, según los resultados, cuando no hay una compensación entre estos procesos, la riqueza comunitaria cambia su valor.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Fleishman et al 2006). Además, según los resultados, cuando no hay una compensación entre estos procesos, la riqueza comunitaria cambia su valor.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Incluso con tasas constantes, los procesos ecológicos no son estáticos y existe un recambio en la composición de especies. Así, la variación temporal en las tasas de extinción y colonización representa una fuente adicional de variabilidad tanto en el valor de la riqueza de especies como en la composición de especies (Fleishman et al 2006).…”
Section: Introduccionunclassified
“…The 20 quadrats per site were summed, and the mean value was used to calculate a mean percentage cover value for each species per site. To address the limitations with species richness metrics (Fleishman et al, 2006), both Shannon diversity index (H′) and effective species richness (expH′) (Jost, 2006) were calculated from the relative abundance data. Effective species richness represents the true diversity rather than an index of diversity; thus, a community with an effective richness of 2.0 is considered twice as diverse as a community with an effective richness of 1.0.…”
Section: Site Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community summary statistics have been criticized for potentially hiding more than they reveal (Lamb et al, 2009), and species richness, in particular, is criticized for treating all species the same (Fleishman et al, 2006). Species differ in conservation concern, in degree of habitat specialization, and in regional habitat occupancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%