2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2917978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility-Based Stable Matching For Large Scale EH Relay Networks With Finite-Alphabet Inputs

Abstract: The computational complexity of utility optimization for a large scale energy harvesting (EH) relay network is extremely high, especially when inputting finite-alphabet signals. This paper investigates the utility optimization for large scale EH relay networks with finite-alphabet inputs by the stable matching scheme. First, we divide the nodes, which may act as a user or a relay, into multiple clusters, and perform optimization strategy within the clusters. Second, the optimal power bought from the relay node… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [15], a wireless powered communication network has been studied with a discrete input and a sum‐throughput maximisation problem has been addressed. Along the same lines, the performance limits of finite constellations over energy harvesting relay networks with utility based stable matching is discussed in [16]. Optimal beamformers for a multiuser multiple input single output visible light channel with optimal constellation have been studied in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15], a wireless powered communication network has been studied with a discrete input and a sum‐throughput maximisation problem has been addressed. Along the same lines, the performance limits of finite constellations over energy harvesting relay networks with utility based stable matching is discussed in [16]. Optimal beamformers for a multiuser multiple input single output visible light channel with optimal constellation have been studied in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%