2015
DOI: 10.1137/130951245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility Maximization in a Regime Switching Model with Convex Portfolio Constraints and Margin Requirements: Optimality Relations and Explicit Solutions

Abstract: We study a problem of stochastic control in mathematical finance, with the goal of maximizing expected utility of investment and consumption over a finite trading horizon. The asset prices are modeled by Itô processes, for which the market parameters are subject to regime switching in the sense of being adapted to the joint filtration of the driving Brownian motion and a finite-state Markov chain which models "regime states" of the market. The vector of portfolios is constrained to a specified closed and conve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the vast majority of the literature, it is often assumed that the investor is able to select his consumption-portfolio strategies with some constraints. For time-additive utilities, on the one hand, one can refer to Cvitanic and Karatzas (1992), Rouge and El Karoui (2000) and Bian, Chen and Xu (2019) for convex constraints, and Hu, Imkeller and Müller (2005), Heunis (2015) and Cheridito and Hu (2011) for closed constraints. On the other hand, for recursive utilities, in a market with stochastic investment opportunities, the analysis was developed by El Karoui, Peng and Quenez (2001), Wang, Wang and Yang (2016), Aurand and Huang (2020), Schroder and Skiadas (2003), Schroder and Skiadas (2005), Matoussi, Mezghani and Mnif (2015), Yang, Liang and Zhou (2019) and Melnyk, Muhle-Karbe and Seifried (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the vast majority of the literature, it is often assumed that the investor is able to select his consumption-portfolio strategies with some constraints. For time-additive utilities, on the one hand, one can refer to Cvitanic and Karatzas (1992), Rouge and El Karoui (2000) and Bian, Chen and Xu (2019) for convex constraints, and Hu, Imkeller and Müller (2005), Heunis (2015) and Cheridito and Hu (2011) for closed constraints. On the other hand, for recursive utilities, in a market with stochastic investment opportunities, the analysis was developed by El Karoui, Peng and Quenez (2001), Wang, Wang and Yang (2016), Aurand and Huang (2020), Schroder and Skiadas (2003), Schroder and Skiadas (2005), Matoussi, Mezghani and Mnif (2015), Yang, Liang and Zhou (2019) and Melnyk, Muhle-Karbe and Seifried (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [41] and references cited therein for a detailed presentation. The readers are also referred to [37,5,6,47,16] for some results relevant to financial applications with regime-switching systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%