2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2021.151632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of carapace images for long-term photographic identification of nesting green turtles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe this is the first evaluation of whether using differing numbers of scales affects identification accuracy. Our findings could be utilized in other photo ID tools that require less manipulation, such as Hotspotter (Tabuki et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We believe this is the first evaluation of whether using differing numbers of scales affects identification accuracy. Our findings could be utilized in other photo ID tools that require less manipulation, such as Hotspotter (Tabuki et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A high number of sea turtle monitoring projects take place on nesting beaches, whereby researchers collect measurements from nesting females (Mazaris et al, 2017;Phillips et al, 2021). This provides an opportunity to take photographs of the flipper, which may decrease the disturbance turtles experience whilst taking photographs of the head (Waayers et al, 2006;Tabuki et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photographic-identification (photo-ID) is a cost-effective and non-invasive CMR technique that relies on comparing natural marks on individuals using photographs (Schofield et al 2008 ). For sea turtles, photo-ID compares unique patterns of facial scales on the sides of the head (Carter et al 2014 ; Dunbar et al 2014 ; Araujo et al 2016 ; Calmanovici et al 2018 ), dorsal scales of the head (Dunbar et al 2014 ), flippers scales (Gatto et al 2018 ) or carapace images (Tabuki et al 2021 ). These marks remain stable over the years, making them a great long-term identification tool (Carpentier et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hotspotter was developed from the SIFT and Local Naive Bayes Nearest Neighbor (LNBNN) algorithms. It has also shown high reliability in fishes (Crall et al, 2013), mollusks (Barord et al, 2014), insects (Quinby, Creighton & Flaherty, 2021), reptiles (Dunbar et al, 2021 ;Tabuki et al, 2021) and mammals (Crall et al, 2013 ;Lea et al, 2018 ;Nipko, Holcombe & Kelly, 2020). Not all individually identifiable patterns, however, are stable over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%