2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(03)00653-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of heart transplant rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…88,89 Novel methods such as nuclear perfusion and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging may have an evolving role, especially in detecting myocardial edema and increased LV mass. [90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97] One of the most promising cardiac magnetic resonance imaging modalities is T2 quantification. T2 relaxation time is the decay time constant of the magnetic signal after an excitatory pulse.…”
Section: Assessment Of Amr Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…88,89 Novel methods such as nuclear perfusion and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging may have an evolving role, especially in detecting myocardial edema and increased LV mass. [90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97] One of the most promising cardiac magnetic resonance imaging modalities is T2 quantification. T2 relaxation time is the decay time constant of the magnetic signal after an excitatory pulse.…”
Section: Assessment Of Amr Imaging Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mullen et al also observed that cTn could not accurately show acute cardiac rejection over a mean follow-up of 129 ± 9 days (14). Several non-invasive techniques have also been evaluated in this regard, including radionuclide imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, intracardiac electrogram recording, and multiparametric immune monitoring (17)(18)(19)(20). However, none of these non-invasive imaging techniques were found sufficiently reliable to replace EMB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A szívizomzatot érintő ödéma megítélésére a hagyomá-nyosan használt T 2 -súlyozott felvételek alapján számolt miokardiális ödéma arány (a szívizom és vázizomzat jelintenzitásának aránya) nem kellően megbízható az akut rejekció megítélésében (32)(33)(34), habár egy korábbi vizsgálatban Krieghoff és társai az ödéma arány esetén 93%-os negatív prediktív értéket állapítottak meg (20).…”
Section: T 2 -Súlyozott Mérésekunclassified