2020
DOI: 10.1080/15513815.2020.1791292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of Chromosomal Microarray in Children with Unexplained Developmental Delay/Intellectual Disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we excluded patients with epilepsy to obtain a more homogeneous group of patients specific to NDDs. Facial dysmorphism was the most common comorbidity, similar to the literature [Kamath et al, 2022].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, we excluded patients with epilepsy to obtain a more homogeneous group of patients specific to NDDs. Facial dysmorphism was the most common comorbidity, similar to the literature [Kamath et al, 2022].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…When all pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were evaluated, the diagnosis rate was 44.7%. In studies investigating the genetic etiology of ID/DD patients, a genetic cause was found in approximately 40% of the patients (25-50%) [Nambot et al, 2018;Elmas et al, 2019;Kamath et al, 2022;Türkyılmaz et al, 2022].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMA focuses on copy number variations (CNV) and is recommended as the first-tier method to diagnose ID or GDD by many associations (Miller et al, 2010; Subspecialty Group of Neurology, Chinese Society of Pediatrics, Chinese Medical Association, & Project Expert Group of Childhood Neuropathy, China Neurologist Association, 2018). The diagnostic yield of CMA in this population ranges from 12% to 30% (Fan et al, 2018;Kamath et al, 2020;Miller et al, 2010;Moeschler et al, 2014;Yuan et al, 2021). A recent metaanalysis revealed that ES helped to solve 36% (range 8%-90%) of cases in patients with suspected neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), and has been recommended as a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for NDD (Srivastava et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the benefit of establishing a genetic diagnosis is apparent, resources are limited for marginalized groups and in developing countries [ 10 ]. Many developing countries are only starting to adopt CMA as the first-tier evaluation for GDD/ID [ 36 , 45 ]. It is, again, a shared decision-making process for the patient/family and the ordering provider.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%