2020
DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2020190140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of FDG PET and Cardiac MRI in Diagnosis and Monitoring of Immunosuppressive Treatment in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 47 , 49 Visual reduction in the intensity and extent of myocardial inflammation on follow-up 18 FDG-PET imaging and indices, such as Standard Uptake Value, show utility in monitoring response to therapy. 60 , 61 , 62 The exact timing to repeat PET imaging is unknown; however, 4 to 6 months post initiation of treatment has been suggested. 38 Moreover, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) indicates use of CMR to determine eligibility for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement with indications being reduced LV ejection fraction (35%) after immunosuppressive therapy (Class I) or if LGE is present in patients with LV ejection fraction 35% to 49% after immunosuppression (Class IIb).…”
Section: Advanced Cardiac Imaging For Csmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 47 , 49 Visual reduction in the intensity and extent of myocardial inflammation on follow-up 18 FDG-PET imaging and indices, such as Standard Uptake Value, show utility in monitoring response to therapy. 60 , 61 , 62 The exact timing to repeat PET imaging is unknown; however, 4 to 6 months post initiation of treatment has been suggested. 38 Moreover, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) indicates use of CMR to determine eligibility for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement with indications being reduced LV ejection fraction (35%) after immunosuppressive therapy (Class I) or if LGE is present in patients with LV ejection fraction 35% to 49% after immunosuppression (Class IIb).…”
Section: Advanced Cardiac Imaging For Csmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to cardiac sarcoidosis, both FDG PET and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) have a role, and are often complementary in this setting. With FDG PET imaging in an adequately prepared patient, abnormal activity in the myocardium reflects active inflammation, and can be useful in monitoring disease response, whereas on CMRI late gadolinium enhancement represents myocardial fibrosis or scarring 20 . There are few cases reporting the use of FDG PET scanning when subcutaneous involvement is present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cardiac sarcoidosis, segments that are positive for LGE on MRI but negative for focal FDG uptake on PET likely reflect myocardial scarring/fibrosis in the setting of chronic disease without active inflammation. Compared to LGE, focal FDG uptake on PET is a more specific marker of active disease reflecting metabolically active immune cells and typically resolves or regresses following anti-inflammatory treatment (Coulden et al 2020 ). FDG-PET is particularly well suited for investigation of cardiac sarcoidosis due to the presence of macrophage-dense regions in areas of active sarcoidosis (Li et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When available, combined PET/MRI with T1/T2 mapping could improve diagnostic performance and risk stratification of patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis compared to either modality alone. FDG uptake on PET is particularly useful to rule in active disease when positive and may also be an important noninvasive biomarker for monitoring response to anti-inflammatory therapy (Coulden et al 2020 ). Cardiac MRI findings are more sensitive and are therefore helpful in ruling out cardiac sarcoidosis when negative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%