Since its original description in 1981 [1], continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) is a well established effective and evidence-based treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) [2]. However, the determination of optimal CPAP pressure in the laboratory is time-consuming and expensive, contributing to delays in the treatment of this condition. As sleep laboratory availability and expense is an issue of concern, several methods that could shorten long waiting lists and lower costs have been suggested. These are split-night studies [3], auto-CPAP titration [4], home sleep diagnostic studies [5], unattended autotitrating home CPAP studies [6] and more recently CPAP prediction formulas [7][8][9][10].In this issue of Sleep and Breathing, Ozen K. Basoglu and colleagues of the Ege University of Turkey in their paper "Determination of new prediction formula for nasal continuous positive airway pressure in Turkish patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome" developed and validated a new prediction formula of optimal CPAP in a Turkish population with OSAS and compared the new formula with two previous formulas designed and validated in Caucasian and Asian populations. The new formula utilizes neck circumference (NC) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI). One of the previous formulas, the Hoffstein formula, utilizes the BMI, neck circumference and AHI in its prediction of the optimal CPAP pressure. This formula has been used for the determination of reference pressure by most investigators in the literature so far [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The other formula takes into account BMI and AHI in predicting the optimal CPAP pressure setting in Taiwanese population [9]. The authors found that there is no significant difference between the three formulas in predicting the optimal CPAP pressure setting and that the new formula performs better than the previous formulas, though the improved accuracy was not statistically or clinically significant.The study is of some interest as the new formula is the first prediction formula derived and validated in a Turkish population. It is known that ethnic variability and related lifestyle habits may strongly influence the anthropometric variables in the severity of OSAHS as well as the effective CPAP pressure [20]. Therefore, the purpose of the present study and the rationale for another CPAP prediction formula was to investigate possible ethnicity-related effects, and thus create an improved prediction formula for the estimation of the optimum CPAP pressure. However, this underlying assumption was not proved in the course of this study, as there was no difference in the CPAP pressures between CPAP prediction formulas for Caucasians, Asians and Turkish patients, and the authors conclude that race/ ethnicity may not be an important factor in predicting CPAP levels.In the literature several formulas have been used with varying degrees of success to determine the optimal CPAP pressure [7,10,21,22]. Nahmias et al. reported a formula including ideal body weight...