2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of Interobserver Agreement Statistics in Establishing Radiology Resident Learning Curves During Self-directed Radiologic Anatomy Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, with the rapid technical development within the field of radiology it must be argued that continuous learning throughout the career is required. However, a problem with radiology education is the scarcity of measurable data with regard to the learning process during residency (14).…”
Section: Pedagogical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, with the rapid technical development within the field of radiology it must be argued that continuous learning throughout the career is required. However, a problem with radiology education is the scarcity of measurable data with regard to the learning process during residency (14).…”
Section: Pedagogical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on learning curve effects in radiology usually focus on identifying a specific diagnosis or anatomical structure on certain examinations (14,77,78,80). Most studies include either relatively few reviewers or training examinations.…”
Section: Pedagogical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[19][20][21] However, diagnostic skill, defined as a high level of accuracy with high Kappa values when compared to an expert, requires both theoretical knowledge and practical training with calibration. 22,23 We found only one study evaluating training for GDPs in diagnosing CCAAs in PRs and it included only one participant. The study showed that after completing a training package sponsored by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, the GDP had a high sensitivity but low specificity when diagnosing CCAA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%