2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14530-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of micro-CT for dating post-cranial fractures of known post-traumatic ages through 3D measurements of the trabecular inner morphology

Abstract: Fracture dating is an issue at the forefront of forensic sciences. While dating fracture is crucial to understanding and verifying the chronology of events in cases of abuse and violent death, its application is the subject of considerable discussion in the scientific community, filled with limitations and difficulties. Current methods for fracture dating are mainly based on a qualitative assessment through macroscopy, microscopy, and imaging and subject to variations depending on the experience of the observe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Micro CT has been considered the gold standard for evaluating bone morphology and bone microarchitecture [ 18 , 19 ]. Micro CT can accurately quantify bone parameters such as BMD, Tb.Th, Tb.N, Tb.Sp and other bone parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro CT has been considered the gold standard for evaluating bone morphology and bone microarchitecture [ 18 , 19 ]. Micro CT can accurately quantify bone parameters such as BMD, Tb.Th, Tb.N, Tb.Sp and other bone parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Klontzas et al [ 47 ] applied CT-based radiomics to predict postmortem interval, yielding promising results in this exploratory study (AUC = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.584–0.916). A previous forensic study [ 48 ] indicated an association between CT-based quantitative parameters and the age of rib fractures. However, the limited sample size ( n = 9) and the finite number of extracted features ( n = 5) were insufficient for conducting ML analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%