Ultrasound techniques are emerging as a cost-effective alternative to body composition analysis. However, ultrasound wanding at seven sites used for the Jackson and Pollock has not been investigated in comparison to bio-electrical impedance (BIA) body composition analysis (BCA) techniques. A convenience sample (N = 48; Male n = 19, Female n = 29) volunteered and completed the study. Body fat percentage was assessed using the multi-frequency InBody 520 octopolar BIA (MF-BIA) and the BodyMetrix ® BX2000 Ultrasound system within 10 minutes of one another. Agreement was assessed using a paired-sample t-test, correlation, Bland and Altman plot, and frequencies of grouped individual differences.There was no significant difference in body fat percentage estimates between ultrasound and BIA (p = 0.143). The Bland and Altman plot revealed than 95% of ultrasound estimates fell within ± 9.7% of MF-BIA estimates. Additionally, 68.8% of ultrasound estimates were within ± 5% of MF-BIA estimates. The results of this investigation are applicable to both practitioners and professionals working in the wellness/fitness industry as well as for health screenings and obesity prevention. Over the past three decades, BIA has been commonly used in wellness and fitness consultations to provide accurate, quick, and cost-effective results. Ultrasound body composition techniques using the seven-site Jackson Pollock methodology were not statistically different than MF-BIA suggesting their interchangeability for a sample similar to ours.