2017
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of osteon circularity for determining species and interpreting load history in primates and nonprimates

Abstract: Frequent misclassifications in nonhuman comparisons might reflect influences of habitual load complexity and/or strain-mode distributions, or other factors not accounted for by these two considerations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…; Keenan et al. ). One great value of this model for the translation of mechanotransduction studies to the human skeleton and other larger mammals is that it has abundant secondary osteons (Haversian systems), is relatively simply loaded, and has highly heterogeneous histomorphological organization between cortical regions that strongly correlate with specific strain characteristics of load history (Skedros et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Keenan et al. ). One great value of this model for the translation of mechanotransduction studies to the human skeleton and other larger mammals is that it has abundant secondary osteons (Haversian systems), is relatively simply loaded, and has highly heterogeneous histomorphological organization between cortical regions that strongly correlate with specific strain characteristics of load history (Skedros et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Keenan et al. ). If, however, there is some unrecognized reason that there is in fact inhomogeneity in the distribution of sealed + partially sealed osteons, then rigorous proof of our assumption that there is no bias can only be obtained in future studies that employ multiple serial sections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…the material is completely homogeneous) and (ii) the plane of the section must be random. In this context our data dealing with the prevalence and size of sealed + partially sealed osteons should be representative and unbiased by our sampling methods (single planar sections and analysis within them in anatomical quadrants) because sealed + partially sealed osteons would be expected to be homogeneously distributed in the bone regions that we analyzed, as also indicated by data of various other secondary osteon variants in many different bones and species (Skedros et al 2007;Keenan et al 2017). If, however, there is some unrecognized reason that there is in fact inhomogeneity in the distribution of sealed + partially sealed osteons, then rigorous proof of our assumption that there is no bias can only be obtained in future studies that employ multiple serial sections.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is because the only foot bones of nonhuman primates in which cross‐sectional geometry has been studied are metatarsals, wherein predictable relationships between strength properties and locomotion have been found in apes and monkeys (e.g., Marchi, , ; Patel et al, ; Patel, Organ, Jashashvili, Bui, & Dunsworth, ). Although the calcaneus is frequently modeled as a beam in ungulates (e.g., Keenan, Mears, & Skedros, ; Skedros, Su, Knight, Bloebaum, & Bachus, ; Su, Skedros, Bachus, & Bloebaum, ), this method has yet to be applied to the distally elongated calcaneus of galagids, which resembles a long bone in both external morphology and in cross section (Hall‐Craggs, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%