2021
DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of PET-CT in non-small cell lung cancer clinical stage IB-IIA according to AJCC 8th edition staging system: an alternative to invasive mediastinal staging?

Abstract: Objective: Mediastinal nodal staging in lung cancer is essential to determine treatment strategy and prognosis. There are controversies as to whether a mediastinal negative result in PET-CT may spare the invasive staging of the mediastinum. The main endpoint is to evaluate the negative predictive value (NPV) of PET-CT in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinical stage IB-IIA without clinical nodal involvement. The secondary endpoint is to evaluate the prevalence of mediastinal and hilar nodal affection in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accepted threshold for detecting 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avidity in lymph nodes is a standardized uptake value (SUV) of ≥2.5. 16 Overall, PET/CT was shown to have a sensitivity of up to 88% and has a specificity of 96% for the clinical staging of NSCLC. 17 The improved sensitivity of PET/CT over CT imaging alone for staging is likely explained by the ability of the former to detect abnormal FDG metabolism prior to the development of any anatomic abnormalities on CT. 18 When specifically evaluating the effectiveness of PET/CT in mediastinal lymph nodes for clinical staging, PET/CT is less effective.…”
Section: Clinical Stagingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The accepted threshold for detecting 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avidity in lymph nodes is a standardized uptake value (SUV) of ≥2.5. 16 Overall, PET/CT was shown to have a sensitivity of up to 88% and has a specificity of 96% for the clinical staging of NSCLC. 17 The improved sensitivity of PET/CT over CT imaging alone for staging is likely explained by the ability of the former to detect abnormal FDG metabolism prior to the development of any anatomic abnormalities on CT. 18 When specifically evaluating the effectiveness of PET/CT in mediastinal lymph nodes for clinical staging, PET/CT is less effective.…”
Section: Clinical Stagingmentioning
confidence: 94%