2015
DOI: 10.1111/echo.13096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of Real Time 3D Echocardiography for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Mass in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Abstract: Three-dimensional echocardiography is an accurate method for the quantification of LVM in patients with different subtypes of HCM that is in better agreement with CMR reference values than M-mode measurements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3D echocardiography is also an accurate method for quantifying LV mass. It is in better agreement with the reference value for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), which is considered to be the gold standard for quantifying LV mass [14]. It also has advantages over cMRI due to its availability, rapid image acquisition and processing, and in cases where the patient has no access to the cMRI scanner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…3D echocardiography is also an accurate method for quantifying LV mass. It is in better agreement with the reference value for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), which is considered to be the gold standard for quantifying LV mass [14]. It also has advantages over cMRI due to its availability, rapid image acquisition and processing, and in cases where the patient has no access to the cMRI scanner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The 3D echocardiography is an accurate method for quantifying left ventricular mass. It is in better agreement with the reference value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), which is considered to be the gold standard for quantifying left ventricular masses[ 9 ]. It also has advantages over cMRI in its availability, rapid image acquisition, and processing, and in cases where the patient cannot access a cMRI scanner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…It may be hard to distinguish between trabeculae and LV cavity; delineation is easier among hypertrophied patients with increased EDV. Recognised difficulties in LVM-quantification amongst HCM are illustrated by relatively large LOAs’ when comparing 3DE to CMR 29 , 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%