Utility of the Current Procedural Terminology Codes for Prophylactic Stabilization for Defining Metastatic Femur Disease

Abstract

Introduction: Cohorts from the electronic health record are often defined by the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The error prevalence of CPT codes for patients receiving surgical treatment of metastatic disease of the femur has not been investigated, and the predictive value of coding ontologies to identify patients with metastatic disease of the femur has not been adequately discussed. Methods: All surgical cases at a single academic tertiary institution from 2010 through 2015 involving prophylactic stabilization of the femur or fixation of a pathologic fracture of the femur were identified using the CPT and International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes. A detailed chart review was conducted to determine the procedure performed as documented in the surgical note and the patient diagnosis as documented in the pathology report, surgical note, and/or office visit notes. Results: We identified 7 CPT code errors of 171 prophylactic operations (4.1%) and one error of 71 pathologic fracture fixation s(1.4%). Of the 164 prophylactic operations that were coded correctly, 87 (53.0%) had metastatic disease. Of the 70 pathologic operations that were coded correctly, 41 (58%) had metastatic disease. Discussion: The error prevalence was low in both prophylactic stabilization and pathologic fixation groups (4.1% and 1%, respectively). The structured data (CPT and ICD-9 codes) had a positive predictive value for patients having metastatic disease of 53% for patients in the prophylactic stabilization group and 58% for patients in the pathologic fixation group. The CPT codes and ICD codes assessed in this analysis do provide a useful tool for defining a population in which a moderate proportion of individuals have metastatic disease in the femur at an academic medical center. However, verification is necessary.

ChartSweep: A HIPAA-compliant Tool to Automate Chart Review for Plastic Surgery Research

“…Previous studies have described the use of NLP and/or CPT codes to expedite the process of RCR. 23–26 Billing codes are often entered by nonclinical administrative staff and fail to account for clinical details embedded in provider notes that are important for correct disease definition. New AI-equipped platforms are currently being developed to analyze narrative text reports and eventually assist with time-consuming RCR of large patient cohorts.…”

Prevalence of primary malignant tumours, rates of pathological fracture, and mortality in the setting of metastatic bone disease

“…As with any large dataset, our data may be subject to coding errors, both in general and as a problem specifically identified in metastatic bone disease. 34 Given the retrospective nature of these data, there may be unaccounted selection bias as to which patients received prophylactic fixation. This dataset does not have the ability to capture the patients’ outpatient therapy regimens, so no conclusions can be drawn as to whether certain complications could be related to common medical treatments for specific diseases.…”