2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of the Cylex Assay in Cardiac Transplant Recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
29
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
29
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…9 The major contention in this study was the very small number of infection (n ϭ 7) and rejection (n ϭ 1) episodes. With such small numbers, significant correlations would be difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 The major contention in this study was the very small number of infection (n ϭ 7) and rejection (n ϭ 1) episodes. With such small numbers, significant correlations would be difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…8 However, in a recent study by Gupta et al, involving 111 heart transplant patients, scores did not correlate with infection (n ϭ 7) or rejection (n ϭ 1). 9 The purpose of the current study was to investigate the utility of this IM assay in a large number of heart transplant recipients at our institution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported, the Cylex ImmuKnow assay has a high predictive value and provides a target immunological response level for minimizing the risk of post-transplant infection and rejection in solid organ transplantation (Kowalski et al 2006;Husain et al 2009;Bhorade et al 2008). However, a few studies have indicated that the immune function assay has a very limited role in assessing the risk of infection or rejection in cardiac transplant recipients (Gupta et al 2008;Rossano et al 2009) and the risk of rejection in renal transplantation after Thymoglobulin induction therapy (Serban et al 2009). In our ROC analysis, we found that the immune function assay was helpful in the diagnosis of infection and rejection with acceptable levels of sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative indicator could be CD4 + T cell activation, which the Cylex ImmuKnow assay was designed to measure. This assay was never embraced clinically, because its utility was never definitively demonstrated (31,32). Therefore, in the absence of a clinically useful and validated measure of immunosuppression, the tacrolimus trough level has become the standard.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%