2020
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of the Free Vascularized Fibula Flap to Reconstruct Oncologic Defects in the Upper Extremity

Abstract: Background/Aim: Non-vascularized methods to reconstruct bone defects following tumor resection are associated with complications. As a result, the free vascularized fibular flap (FVF) has become a mainstay for reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to analyze FVF reconstruction in the upper extremity. Patients and Methods: We reviewed 28 (14 female and 14 male, mean age of 29±20 years) patients reconstructed with an FVF in the upper extremity following tumor resection. Reconstruction most commonly invol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 Surgeons have utilized the free fibula transfer to reconstruct a myriad of humeral defects when nonvascularized bone graft or prosthesis would not be sufficient. [14][15][16] However, there conceivably exist circumstances where a free fibula flap is not an option, as in our shoulder arthrodesis case. Patients with multiple previous surgeries and attempts at wound coverage may have significant disruption of the regional vasculature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…12,13 Surgeons have utilized the free fibula transfer to reconstruct a myriad of humeral defects when nonvascularized bone graft or prosthesis would not be sufficient. [14][15][16] However, there conceivably exist circumstances where a free fibula flap is not an option, as in our shoulder arthrodesis case. Patients with multiple previous surgeries and attempts at wound coverage may have significant disruption of the regional vasculature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, the proximal fibula-ulnar coaptation failed to unite and the patient developed non-union. In a series of 28 VFF grafts for oncological reconstruction of the upper limb, primary union was achieved in 71% of cases, increasing to 96% following supplemental bone-grafting [4] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the incidence of stress fracture for one-barrel bula grafts ranging from 20-40% within 1 year, especially for the bone defect of lower extremity [15,16] . One-barrel bula graft provides su cient biomechanical and bone support for long bone defects including humerus, radius and ulna [17] . Double or folded bula grafts were chosen when intermediate stress loads were applied to the resection site [18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%