2018
DOI: 10.1101/248484
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of the SWAN Scale for ADHD Trait-Based Genetic Research: A Validity and Polygenic Risk Study

Abstract: BackgroundValid and genetically-informative trait measures of psychopathology collected in the general population would provide a powerful complement to case/control genetic designs. We report the convergent, predictive and discriminant validity of the parent- and the self-report versions of the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behavior Rating Scale (SWAN) for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) traits. We tested if SWAN ADHD scores were associated with ADHD diagnosis, ADHD poly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although ADHD is one of the most commonly experienced neurobehavioral disorders, diagnostic assessment is still mainly based on subjective screening of perceived individual behavior (Burton et al, 2018). Most ADHD studies in the entrepreneurship domain thus far have relied on self-reports of ADHD and the degree to which symptoms are experienced in cross-sectional settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ADHD is one of the most commonly experienced neurobehavioral disorders, diagnostic assessment is still mainly based on subjective screening of perceived individual behavior (Burton et al, 2018). Most ADHD studies in the entrepreneurship domain thus far have relied on self-reports of ADHD and the degree to which symptoms are experienced in cross-sectional settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome measure is ADHD symptomology, as measured by The SWAN-behaviour scale 54. The SWAN scale is an 18-item questionnaire, validated for use in children 6–18 years55 56 and is completed online by parents and teachers. They are asked to rate the child by comparing them to other children of the same age group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose this tool because it showed proper reliability and validity for measuring attention and hyperactivity in children (Lakes et al, 2012;Saxena et al, 2020). Furthermore, the Chinese version of the tool has good psychometric properties, is reliable and valid for assessing ADHD symptoms in Chinese children (Lai et al, 2013), has a high sensitivity in predicting ADHD diagnosis, and is useful for research (Burton et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%