Utility of the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening in Military Medicine: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Introduction The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) was created as a brief clinical screening tool for identifying vestibular and ocular motor symptoms and impairments post-concussion. It was found to have predictive validity in correctly identifying concussed athletes from healthy controls. In 2018, the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE2) replaced the original Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE); the most prominent change between the MACE and MACE2 was the addition of the VOMS. Despite its adoption into military medicine, it is not known if the addition of the VOMS to the MACE2 is acutely helpful, and if it provides additional information for diagnosis, prognosis, and/or management. The purposes of this systematic review were: (1) to determine the utility of the VOMS in correctly identifying concussed individuals, particularly as it pertains to military medicine; (2) to explore the extent to which the VOMS can inform concussion prognosis; and (3) to establish the value of the VOMS as a measure for monitoring the evolution of symptoms throughout a service member’s course of care. Materials and Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed was performed from January 1, 2014 through August 16, 2023. Articles were included if they researched concussion or a related health condition or healthy controls and administered the VOMS. Articles were excluded if they discussed health conditions other than concussion; did not administer the VOMS; or were written in languages other than English. The tools used to assess methodological quality and risk of bias varied according to study design. Articles were classified into three primary domains: diagnosis, prognosis, and/or rehabilitation/recovery over time. Results A total of 231 articles were retrieved and 3 were duplicates, leaving 228 articles for review. Of the 228 articles screened, 100 relevant full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Fifty-nine articles met our inclusion and exclusion criteria while the other 41 articles were rejected. Thirty-two articles helped to inform diagnosis, 15 prognosis, and 16 rehabilitation/recovery over time. Conclusions The VOMS had excellent internal consistency and moderate to good test-retest reliability; however, a false-positive rate of 21.9% was found. Most studies indicated that a positive VOMS was associated with a delayed recovery. Several studies indicated that VOMS scores improved with targeted, active interventions and/or a symptom-guided progressive return to activity. The greatest limitation was the paucity of published evidence in the military population. More research is needed on the use of the VOMS in service members.