Utility of Trephine Drills in Implant Dentistry

Rai, Anshul; Agrawal, Surendra; Datarkar, Abhay

doi:10.1007/s12663-014-0682-0

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[14] Dental implant trephine has also shown to produce less bone loss when compared to the standard drill. [16] The limitations of the present study were that the study was done in in vitro animal model which does not simulate the exact oral conditions of the human and also the sample size is less, so same can be verified with more sample size in the human studies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Comparative study to evaluate bone loss during osteotomy using standard drill, bone trephine, and alveolar expanders for implant placement

Bhargava

Thomas

Pandey

et al. 2018

J Indian Prosthodont Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Comparative study to evaluate bone loss during osteotomy using standard drill, bone trephine, and alveolar expanders for implant placement

Bhargava

Thomas

Pandey

et al. 2018

J Indian Prosthodont Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…But, the author declared that care is needed during lateral window preparation to decrease the risk of sinus membrane tearing (7). In 2014, Rai et al, (12) suggested that the use of trephine drills instead of conventional drills will maintain the bone during osteotomy. The advantages of trephine drills used for implant site preparation were highlighted as trephine burs save more than 40 % of the bone during implant drilling, are time-saving, easy to be used with minimum injury to the bone.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At a speed ranging from 800 to 1200 rpm with copious irrigation (external and internal), implant site preparation was done using the trephine drills (Dentium company, Seoul, Korea.). The trephine drills sizes were less than 0.5 mm than the diameter of the placed implant (e.g: 3.5 mm for 4 mm implant) (12). Using an implant stability meter (Osstell ISQ®, W&H Co, Gothenburg, Sweden), primary stability was measured.…”

Section: Surgical Procedures (7)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bone conservation and precise angulation of implant during osteotomy affect the long-term success of implants (11). In 2014, Rai et al, (12) suggested the use of trephine drills rather than conventional drills to preserve the bone during implant site preparation. After the cortical osteotomy using trephines is complete, the resultant trephine cutting edge is plugging in and encouraged with dense cortical bone; so, bone marrow condensation rather than actual marrow removal takes place (13).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Lateral Sinus Lift Technique Using Trephine Osteotomy With Simultaneous Implant Placement (Clinical Trial)

Abdelrahman

Shaaban²,

Melek³

2022

Alexandria Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTION:The lateral approach for sinus floor augmentation using the trephine-osteotomy is a precise surgical technique. For the time being, in implant dentistry, trephine drills have been used instead of conventional drills to conserve the bone during osteotomy. AIM OF THE STUDY:To evaluate the effectiveness of trephine osteotomy for lateral sinus lifting technique associated with sinus floor augmentation using the autogenous bone resulting from implant drilling using specialized trephine drills. MATERIAL AND METHOD:In this clinical study, 12 Patients were included and have been subjected to lateral sinus lifting using trephine osteotomy with simultaneous implant placement with delay loading. A bone graft used in sinus floor augmentation has been prepared using autogenous bone resulting from implant site preparation in addition to β-tricalcium phosphate. Patients were followed up both clinically and radiographically for 6 months after surgery. A Panoramic radiograph was performed immediately postoperatively and CBCT was performed 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: After 6 months, the difference between the primary stability and implant stability was statistically significant as p-value ≤ 0.05. After 6 months, The mean bone density and the mean vertical bone height were increased by 984.7 ± 276.2 mm and 11.71 ± 0.72 mm respectively. CONCLUSION: Trephine osteotomy technique in both lateral approach of sinus lifting and implant site preparation allows preservation of autogenous bone. Moreover, the trephine osteotomy technique in the lateral approach of sinus lifting eliminates the use of an absorbable membrane. However, this technique requires proper case selection and is considered sensitive.

show abstract

“…However, bone quality assessment by Lekholm and Zarb 9 mainly relies on the combination of radiographic and tactile analyses without examination of bony tissue specimens. Bone core specimens, 11–14 which are cylindric bone biopsies to be replaced by the implant fixtures, can be obtained for additional observation.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Bone Type of Implant Recipient Sites by Stereomicroscopic Observation of Bone Core Specimens: A Comparison With the Assessment Using Dental Radiography

Shen

et al. 2017

Journal of Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Utility of Trephine Drills in Implant Dentistry

Cited by 4 publications

References 2 publications

Comparative study to evaluate bone loss during osteotomy using standard drill, bone trephine, and alveolar expanders for implant placement

Comparative study to evaluate bone loss during osteotomy using standard drill, bone trephine, and alveolar expanders for implant placement

Lateral Sinus Lift Technique Using Trephine Osteotomy With Simultaneous Implant Placement (Clinical Trial)

Assessing Bone Type of Implant Recipient Sites by Stereomicroscopic Observation of Bone Core Specimens: A Comparison With the Assessment Using Dental Radiography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About