2014
DOI: 10.18041/1794-4953/avances.1.302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilización de Tuna (opuntia ficus-indica) como coagulante natural en la clarificación de aguas crudas

Abstract: En la clarificación del agua potable se utilizan productos químicos como el sulfato de aluminio para remover materia coloidal y sustancias orgánicas, mejorando la calidad del agua. Elevadas concentraciones de aluminio residual en el agua potable tienen implicaciones en la salud humana, siendo necesario el desarrollo de coagulantes alternativos, ambientalmente aceptables para reemplazarlos. En esta investigación se evaluaron las propiedades que tiene la tuna opuntia ficus-indica y el alumbre en la clarificación… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1
11

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, the removal efficiency of turbidity was 50.2% with a standard deviation of 15.14%. This differs from the efficiencies found by Olivero et al (2014) and Miller et al (2008), who achieved reductions in turbidity between 83.66% and 92%-99%, respectively, using the nopal as a natural coagulant to clarify raw water; however, the methods used to extract the nopal mucilage were different from our study, and this most likely significantly affected the final result regarding effectiveness of the coagulant. Likewise, an investigation conducted by Mukhtar et al (2015) also achieved higher removals (i.e., up to a 91% reduction in turbidity) but other species of cactus were used, specifically Opuntia stricta, which would make it necessary to investigate the efficacies of other species of cactus native to Colombia, such as Melocactus curvispinus Pfeiffer subsp.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…On average, the removal efficiency of turbidity was 50.2% with a standard deviation of 15.14%. This differs from the efficiencies found by Olivero et al (2014) and Miller et al (2008), who achieved reductions in turbidity between 83.66% and 92%-99%, respectively, using the nopal as a natural coagulant to clarify raw water; however, the methods used to extract the nopal mucilage were different from our study, and this most likely significantly affected the final result regarding effectiveness of the coagulant. Likewise, an investigation conducted by Mukhtar et al (2015) also achieved higher removals (i.e., up to a 91% reduction in turbidity) but other species of cactus were used, specifically Opuntia stricta, which would make it necessary to investigate the efficacies of other species of cactus native to Colombia, such as Melocactus curvispinus Pfeiffer subsp.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…En el año 2014, se determinó que a una dosis de 40 mg/L la turbidez del agua del río Magdalena en el municipio de Magangué-Bolívar, es removida un 98,30% partiendo de una turbidez inicial de 174 UNT [25].…”
Section: Análisis Estadísticounclassified
“…Some coagulants employed to remove impurities and colloidal particles from wastewater are ferric chlorides, aluminum sulfate, polyaluminum chloride, and calcium carbonate (Bergamasco et al, 2009). Nevertheless, there are some disadvantages related to the use of coagulants, such as cost, production of large volumes of sludge and pH modifications of the treated water (Olivero et al, 2014;Yin, 2010). Bergamasco et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%