2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05397-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization, duration, and outcomes of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of this, NAC remains a therapeutic strategy of choice for patients with locally advanced (IIb-IIIc) disease, in those requiring pre-operative downstaging, and in women hoping for breast conservation despite an increased tumour to breast ratio [45]. In conventional ER þ breast cancer management, NET is typically prescribed in 3.1% of cases, compared to NAC in 24.7% of cases [46]. In their meta-analysis of prospective trials, Spring et al describe similar pCR rates for patients with ER þ disease receiving NET vs. those prescribed NAC, however, suffer significantly less toxicities [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of this, NAC remains a therapeutic strategy of choice for patients with locally advanced (IIb-IIIc) disease, in those requiring pre-operative downstaging, and in women hoping for breast conservation despite an increased tumour to breast ratio [45]. In conventional ER þ breast cancer management, NET is typically prescribed in 3.1% of cases, compared to NAC in 24.7% of cases [46]. In their meta-analysis of prospective trials, Spring et al describe similar pCR rates for patients with ER þ disease receiving NET vs. those prescribed NAC, however, suffer significantly less toxicities [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a study of neoadjuvant exemestane showed a 7.7% progression rate at 4 months, increasing to only 8% at 6 months of treatment [21]. Despite the evidence, uptake of NET remained suboptimal, and it was stated that neoadjuvant ET in postmenopausal women with ER+ stage 2/3 tumors is currently underused, although it shows low toxicity when compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (panel discussion at the 2017 St. Gallen Conference) [22]. NET for up to 12 months is safe with close monitoring of tumor burden.…”
Section: Current Status Of Systemic Neoadjuvant Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States of America, real-world data showed that women with breast cancer who received NET for longer treatment durations had increased odds of BCS and downstaging than women who did not receive NET. 23 NET helps to avoid surgery without tumor progression; this is even more important during the ongoing coronavirus disease pandemic. 24 Hayashi et al examined the time to progression in patients with stage II or III breast cancer treated with NET in a previous multicenter study; the median time to progression was approximately 3 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%