2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of castor bean meal treated with calcium hydroxide, fed wet or dry, by lambs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
8
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
8
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, only the diet without DCBM was lower than the others. The intake of the different nutritional compounds was lower than those reported by several authors [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. We suggest that this difference was due to the animal category that was used, because the animals used in those experiments were heavier and older, and consequently had higher intakes.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, only the diet without DCBM was lower than the others. The intake of the different nutritional compounds was lower than those reported by several authors [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. We suggest that this difference was due to the animal category that was used, because the animals used in those experiments were heavier and older, and consequently had higher intakes.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Teniendo en cuenta este aspecto, la torta de higuerilla tendría potencial para ser utilizada como materia prima para fabricar concentrados comerciales, siendo el nivel óptimo de uso entre 8 y 16 % de inclusión. Esta hipótesis, coincide con trabajos realizados con subproductos de higuerilla en animales rumiantes, con niveles de inclusión entre 8 y 18 %, no se ve afectada la degradación de la MS y PB en dietas compuestas de forraje y concentrado 23,30,32,50,60 . En contraste otros autores reportan un efecto lineal decreciente sobre la degradación de la MS y PB, con el uso de niveles incrementales de inclusión de subproductos provenientes de la higuerilla 9,19,36 .…”
Section: Experimentounclassified
“…Treatments had no effect (P>0.05) on ADG, average total gain, feed conversion, slaughter and carcass weights, chilling losses, and REA (Table 4). Increasing levels of DCM also did not affect ADG, feed efficiency, slaughter and carcass weights, and REA of cattle (Diniz et al 2010), as well as performance, SBW, and carcass traits in sheep (Gionbelli et al 2014 and Table 4 Means and standard error of the means (SEM) of the initial body weight (IBW), slaughter body weight (SBW), average total gain (ATG), average daily gain (ADG), feed conversion (FC), hot carcass weight (HCW), cold carcass weight (CCW), hot carcass yield (HCY), cold carcass yield (CCY), chilling losses (CL) and ribeye area (REA) of lambs fed different levels of partial replacement of soybean meal (SM) by detoxified castor meal (DCM)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Furthermore, the treatment with 30 % of DCM showed greater CPI than the treatments with 0 and 15 % of DCM. Gionbelli et al (2014) also found no effect of replacing SM by DCM on DMI, but observed an increase in CPI, which was also greater in the higher level of replacement. As there was no effect of treatments on DMI, the variation in CPI could be related to feed selection by the animals in a possible response to lower absorption of metabolizable protein with the addition of DCM to the diet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%