Offspring size variation can have pervasive ecological and evolutionary implications for both offspring and mother, affecting an organism's performance throughout its life. Using 2 marine intertidal whelk species Cominella virgata and C. maculosa as model organisms, we examined how different maternal environments and contrasting hatchling size influence juvenile performance. The average size of field-collected hatchlings greatly differed between the species and at different scales of variation (i.e. among sites). Species-specific differences in hatching size were reflected in juvenile performance. Overall, C. virgata with larger hatchlings (~3 mm), exhibited faster growth rates and higher survival than the smaller C. maculosa (~1.5 mm). Desiccation treatment did not affect the performance of fed juveniles; however, large hatchlings had higher growth rates than small conspecifics for both species. Starved hatchlings of both species performed more poorly than fed ones; however, species-specific and size differences were less significant for the evaluated traits, suggesting a non-size-related allocation of resources and similar resource utilization during starvation conditions (i.e. within species). As has been described for many taxa, large offspring often perform better than small conspecifics; however, because this performance is likely context-dependent, understanding the importance of different scales of variation is crucial for determining when variation in size is an advantage or a disadvantage in terms of an organism's performance.
KEY WORDS: Progeny size · Reproductive strategies · Environmental variation · Phenotypic plasticity · Offspring size-fitness · Cominella
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherMar Ecol Prog Ser 459: [73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83] 2012 to either non-adaptive stochastic variation in provisioning or to a maternal bet-hedging strategy in unpredictable environments (see Kamel et al. 2010).The ability of mothers to anticipate the environment that their offspring will experience may therefore mediate variation in offspring size. When mothers are able to predict their offspring's environment, the expectation is that plasticity in mean offspring size will be favored ('anticipatory' maternal effects;Marshall & Uller 2007). Conversely, when mothers are unable to predict the environment, the expected outcome is that increases in the variation of offspring size will ensure that some offspring will be optimal for the environment (Crean & Marshall 2009). Regardless of the strategy, the division of finite reproductive resources should ultimately result in an optimal equilibrium between the offspring fitness and the maximization of the parental fitness, and therefore, simple models have typically suggested that as the relationship between progeny size and progeny fitness changes, the optimal size of progeny is also expected to change as environmental conditions vary (Fox 2000, Walker et al. 2003. Examples provided by Allen et al. (...