2013
DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2013.1.227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of mouse models to decipher natural killer cell biology and potential clinical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that study, the repression was significant at relatively high concentrations of AMP-B (5–10 mg/L, approximately 5.4–10.8 µM), which is compatible with our results using human primary NK cells despite some differences in NK cell activation between mice and men [18,19]. Given the stimulation of NK cells by AMP-B at low concentrations [15,20], the effect of AMP-B on NK cell activation appears to be dose-dependent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In that study, the repression was significant at relatively high concentrations of AMP-B (5–10 mg/L, approximately 5.4–10.8 µM), which is compatible with our results using human primary NK cells despite some differences in NK cell activation between mice and men [18,19]. Given the stimulation of NK cells by AMP-B at low concentrations [15,20], the effect of AMP-B on NK cell activation appears to be dose-dependent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Compared to T cells, the lifespan of an NK cell is proposed to be much shorter, although this topic remains an area of significant debate due to differences between humans and mouse models. Fundamental advances in the understanding of NK cell biology have been generated from mouse models (Sungur and Murphy, 2013), and while these advances have improved understanding of human NK cells, there are critical species differences that limit the application of murine data to human application, opening the door for novel immunocompetent models to study NK biology (Park et al, 2016;Canter et al, 2017). One of the most critical differences between mouse and human NK cells concerns the lifespan of an NK cell and the putative, long-lived "memory" NK cell.…”
Section: Memory Nk Cells and Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, we did not observe a significant modulation of granzyme B or CD107a/LAMP1 expression in tumors isolated from BME treated mice as compared with the control group in the HNSCC syngeneic mouse model (data not shown). The role of NK cells in anti-tumor responses in vivo may be difficult to interpret due to the difference between human and mouse NK cells (29). Human NK cells can be subclassified based upon the level of expression of CD56.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%