2019
DOI: 10.1161/jaha.119.011954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of Palliative Care for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A 15‐Year National Perspective on Trends, Disparities, Predictors, and Outcomes

Abstract: BackgroundThis study sought to evaluate the 15‐year national utilization, trends, predictors, disparities, and outcomes of palliative care services (PCS) use in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.Methods and ResultsA retrospective cohort from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2014 was analyzed using the National Inpatient Sample database. Administrative codes for acute myocardial infarction–cardiogenic shock and PCS were used to identify eligible admissions. The primary outcomes were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the period between 1 January 2000 through 31 December 2016, a retrospective cohort of admissions from the HCUP-NIS with a primary diagnosis of AMI (International Classification of Disease-9 Clinical Modification [ICD-9CM] 410.x; International Classification of Disease-10 Clinical Modification [ICD-10CM] I21.x-22.x) receiving ECMO support (ICD-9CM 39.65; ICD-10CM 5A15223) were identified consistent with prior literature [7]. Deyo's modification of Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to identify co-morbid diseases and prior methodology was used to identify cardiac and non-cardiac procedures [2,3,7,8,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. We identified relevant complications and categorized them as (a) vascular complications-arterial injury, acquired arterio-venous fistula, and vascular complications requiring surgery; (b) lower limb amputation; (c) hematologic-post-operative hemorrhage, hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and blood transfusion; and (d) neurologic-ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke ( Supplementary Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the period between 1 January 2000 through 31 December 2016, a retrospective cohort of admissions from the HCUP-NIS with a primary diagnosis of AMI (International Classification of Disease-9 Clinical Modification [ICD-9CM] 410.x; International Classification of Disease-10 Clinical Modification [ICD-10CM] I21.x-22.x) receiving ECMO support (ICD-9CM 39.65; ICD-10CM 5A15223) were identified consistent with prior literature [7]. Deyo's modification of Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to identify co-morbid diseases and prior methodology was used to identify cardiac and non-cardiac procedures [2,3,7,8,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. We identified relevant complications and categorized them as (a) vascular complications-arterial injury, acquired arterio-venous fistula, and vascular complications requiring surgery; (b) lower limb amputation; (c) hematologic-post-operative hemorrhage, hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and blood transfusion; and (d) neurologic-ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke ( Supplementary Table S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Law et al demonstrated a decline in all time periods of IHD in septic shock patients; however, when adjusted for acute respiratory failure, only the delayed IHD cohort had a temporal decrease [11]. The timing of in-hospital events remains extremely crucial in critical illness since many clinical interventions, such as fluid resuscitation, PCI, MCS, targeted temperature management, vasoactive medications and intensive care monitoring are geared towards the first 24-48 h of critical illness [11,13,16,20]. Therefore, studies evaluating the timing of events aid in prognostication, resource planning and advanced care planning [11,13,16,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The timing of in-hospital events remains extremely crucial in critical illness since many clinical interventions, such as fluid resuscitation, PCI, MCS, targeted temperature management, vasoactive medications and intensive care monitoring are geared towards the first 24-48 h of critical illness [11,13,16,20]. Therefore, studies evaluating the timing of events aid in prognostication, resource planning and advanced care planning [11,13,16,20]. In AMI-CS, most mortality analyses and predictive models have used IHD, 28-day or 30-day mortality as the end-points, with little additional granularity on the timing of IHD during the index hospitalization [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Given the severity of disease and poor prognosis in this patient cohort, we expected a higher consultation rate. [33][34][35][36][37][38] It is possible that providers did not consider involvement of palliative care until all life-prolonging measures had been attempted or exhausted. This is supported by the low rates of documented GoC discussions, leaving little time to involve palliative care providers prior to a patient's death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%