“…This main that the balance is carried out without limitations of the formation of the monolayer and surface of nDCPD is highly heterogeneous allowing to have different adsorption heats scattered throughout the s urface making it more efficient to remove the dyes. This result is consistent with the reported in the literature for different bioadsorbent s (Kyzas et al, 2017;Kwak et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2019;Uddin & Baig, 2019;Cao et al, 2018;Rahman, Akter, & Abedin, 2013;Do-Nascimiento et al, 2014;Tabrizi & Yavari, 2015;Uyar, Kaygusuz, & Erim, 2016;Li et al, 2016;Zong, Li, Tian, Lin, & Lu, 2018;Mudyawabikwa, Mungondori, Tichagwa, & Katwire, 2017;Cheng et al, 2015;Raval, Shah, & Shah, 2016;Shakoor & Nasar, 2017;Mashkoor & Nasar, 2020b;Bulgariu et al, 2019;Kadhom, Albayati, Alalwan, & Al-Furaiji, 2020), but there are other reports where it is mentioned that the best model are Langmuir and SIPS (Qian, Luo, Wang, Guo, & Li, 2018;Mounia et al, 2018;He et al, 2019;Shakoor & Nasar, 2016;Sun et al, 2019;Ma et al, 2018;Islam, Ahmed, Khanday, Asif, & Hameed, 2017;Yang & Guan, 2018;Lv et al, 2019; Marques In general, both models have been reported as the most suitable for adsorption of dyes and already depends on the criteria used to choose the best. The value of n<1 for all temperatures implies that the adsorption on the surface of the bioadsorbent is a physical and favorable process, this was corroborated by Shakoor and Nasar (2017).…”