2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13285-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of red mud waste into mesoporous ZSM-5 for methylene blue adsorption-desorption studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of adsorbate at equilibrium, at a particular time and MB removal efficiency, were calculated using the equations (1-3), respectively (Tehubijuluw et al, 2021).…”
Section: Adsorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of adsorbate at equilibrium, at a particular time and MB removal efficiency, were calculated using the equations (1-3), respectively (Tehubijuluw et al, 2021).…”
Section: Adsorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported by Shams-Ghahfarokhi and Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh [24], due to its sufficiently high hydrophobicity, ZSM-5 adsorbs more dye molecules on its surface, where hydroxyl radicals are generated in the photocatalytic processes, thus increasing the photocatalytic activity of the semiconductor. Additionally, ZSM-5 can be obtained from the conversion of RM owing to its high contents of alumina and silica, as reported in our previous study [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…When we compare RB and MB dyes, the higher degree of RB removal in the presence of NH 4 ZSM-5 zeolite can be explained by the greater possibilities of binding to the outer zeolite surface because at pH > 3, RB dye behaves both as a weak base and as a weak acid. The high degree of MB dye removal in the presence of NH 4 BETA and NaY zeolites can be explained by the smaller dimensions of the MB molecules, which, in addition to binding to the outer surface, are most probably also bound to the active centers of the inner zeolite surface [ 17 , 49 , 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%