1974
DOI: 10.2307/1127758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilization of Retrieval Cues by Children in Recall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0
2

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This cued recall condition was added to assess children's recall and clustering behavior after the categorical relationships among the items had been made explicit and the optimal retrieval structure was thus available. However, it should be noted that this condition was similar to the "directive cue" condition used by Kobasigawa (1974), where Ss were directed to recall all items from one category before proceeding to the next. Superior performance was expected for cued recall as opposed to serial recall for both age groups based on the effectiveness of categorical retrieval structures compared with serial search and reconstruction processes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cued recall condition was added to assess children's recall and clustering behavior after the categorical relationships among the items had been made explicit and the optimal retrieval structure was thus available. However, it should be noted that this condition was similar to the "directive cue" condition used by Kobasigawa (1974), where Ss were directed to recall all items from one category before proceeding to the next. Superior performance was expected for cued recall as opposed to serial recall for both age groups based on the effectiveness of categorical retrieval structures compared with serial search and reconstruction processes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the fifth graders, the first graders showed poor clustering and were hardly aware of how they managed to retrieve the names. Similarly, Kobasigawa (1974) and Ackerman (1996) showed that young children fail to use retrieval cues and retrieval strategies. In fact, memory processes involving a higher amount of controlled processes appear to develop later than those involving a lower amount (Haberlandt, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, those 4-year-old children who received explicit instruction "to put those toys together that go together" before a study period recalled significantly more to-be-remembered objects than children who were in a play-in-remember condition (Sodian, et al, 1986). Moreover, it has been also found that providing category cues at the time of retrieval improves children's recall performance substantially (Kobasigawa, 1974;Sodian, et al, 1986). Therefore, it was not surprising that maternal emphasis on categorical relations among items both at the time of encoding and later at retrieval was positively related to children's recall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research on young children's memory development has reported that the most difficult task for young children is to access stored information from long-term memory rather than to encode it in the first place (Howe, Brainerd, & Kingma, 1985). A number of studies demonstrated that under highly supportive retrieval conditions, when directive cues were provided, young children were able to recall as much information about the stimuli as older children (e.g., Kee & Bell, 1981;Kobasigawa, 1974).In the present investigation, mothers' behavior was assessed during the study and recall phases of a memory task. What mothers did when helping their children to study the to-be-remembered items and later to recall them independently predicted children's memory performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%