2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-009-0180-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilizing different methods for visualizing susceptibility from a single multi-gradient echo dataset

Abstract: Combined T*2-weighted imaging and SGM using the same complex image data was found to provide complementary information and high sensitivity to detect distortion inducing agents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in other positive contrast techniques, SUMO cannot differentiate positive contrast generated by the devices from other unrelated sources of susceptibility (e.g., air‐to‐tissue interfaces). This ambiguity may be reduced by taking the direction, size, and shape of the susceptibility gradient generated from the devices into account (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As in other positive contrast techniques, SUMO cannot differentiate positive contrast generated by the devices from other unrelated sources of susceptibility (e.g., air‐to‐tissue interfaces). This ambiguity may be reduced by taking the direction, size, and shape of the susceptibility gradient generated from the devices into account (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a more reliable MR-visualization of metallic devices is of interest.In MRI, the visualization of metallic devices such as endovascular stent grafts or prostate brachytherapy seeds (6) is traditionally based on signal voids due to local susceptibility gradients. It has been shown that for better visualization of devices, it is attractive to convert the signal loss into positive contrast (7). For this, a variety of positive contrast techniques have been proposed (8,9), but often require optimization based on the magnitude of the local field gradients and local off-resonance effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with the relatively low iron concentration of 29 mmol Fe kg À1 body weight, the in vivo CNR for SGM was still greater than 5, which is assumed to be the lower detection limit for molecular imaging (30). Recently, Varma et al (31) introduced a white marker post-processing approach with a three-dimensional (3D) acquisition, which might resolve these issues. White marker did not show positive contrast in tumor areas where contrast was observed with R 2 * mapping, GE or SGM (Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Mri Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably this contribution is too small to be detected in vivo. Recently, Varma et al (31) introduced a white marker post-processing approach with a three-dimensional (3D) acquisition, which might resolve these issues.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Mri Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR imaging of cells in vivo is commonly performed using gradient-or spin-echo sequences for T 2 -or T 2 *weighted negative-contrast imaging of cells labeled with ultra-small superparamagnetic iron-oxide (USPIO) nanoparticles (8)(9)(10). Negative-contrast methods image the accumulation of USPIO nanoparticles through loss of signal due to the strong T 2 * dephasing induced locally by the presence of the superparamagnetic nanoparticles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%