Geospatial Techniques in Urban Hazard and Disaster Analysis 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2238-7_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilizing New Technologies in Managing Hazards and Disasters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors reported that it is more meaningful to perform a fusion of the feature maps coming from each of the resolutions than to have all the multi-resolution imagery share features in a single CNN. Nonetheless, the multi-resolution feature fusion approach was (1) not tested for the airborne (manned and unmanned) resolution levels and (2) not tested for the model transferability when a new region was only considered in the validation step.…”
Section: Cnn Feature Fusion Approaches In Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors reported that it is more meaningful to perform a fusion of the feature maps coming from each of the resolutions than to have all the multi-resolution imagery share features in a single CNN. Nonetheless, the multi-resolution feature fusion approach was (1) not tested for the airborne (manned and unmanned) resolution levels and (2) not tested for the model transferability when a new region was only considered in the validation step.…”
Section: Cnn Feature Fusion Approaches In Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of damaged buildings after a disastrous event is of utmost importance for several stages of the disaster management cycle [1,2]. Manual inspection is not efficient since it takes a considerable amount of resources and time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing techniques have been increasingly adopted to map disaster areas in recent decades [1][2][3] as witnessed by a rapidly growing amount of research works dealing with optical [4][5][6], radar [7,8], and laser [9,10] data with each sensor giving different advantages. Except for subtle damage patterns that deformation-sensitive radar can identify particularly well, optical data are usually preferrable to detect building damage [11] in the early hours after the event as images are more easily interpretable by human operators who still typically carry out the initial damage map production manually [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building damage maps have been recurrently used in the response and recovery phase of the disaster management cycle. Damaged buildings may be a proxy for victim localization (Dell'Acqua and Gamba, 2012) and their identification can also aid to plan and delineate recovery activities (Eguchi et al, 2009). Remote sensing has been extensively used to perform the damage assessment of a given region affected by a disastrous event (Dell'Acqua and Gamba, 2012;Dong and Shan, 2013;Gerke and Kerle, 2011;Vetrivel et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%