2013
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilizing pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics modeling to simultaneously examine free CCL2, total CCL2 and carlumab (CNTO 888) concentration time data

Abstract: The chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) promotes angiogenesis, tumor proliferation, migration, and metastasis. Carlumab is a human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody with high CCL2 binding affinity. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data from 21 cancer patients with refractory tumors were analyzed. The PK/PD model characterized the temporal relationships between serum concentrations of carlumab, free CCL2, and the carlumab-CCL2 complex. Dose-dependent increases in total CCL2 concentrations were observed and were consistent with sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That study also showed a dose-dependent increase in total CCL2 levels (>2000 times baseline levels), although most of this was presumably complexed with anti-CCL2, as the report suggests that free levels of CCL2 were suppressed [32]. In another study of carlumab in cancer patients, free levels of CCL2 were able to be suppressed when measured shortly after infusion, but as early as 7 days later were at or above baseline levels [33]. These data suggest that there is a large pool of CCL2 available for binding to anti-CCL2 antibodies, but that suppression of free CCL2 for prolonged periods did not occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…That study also showed a dose-dependent increase in total CCL2 levels (>2000 times baseline levels), although most of this was presumably complexed with anti-CCL2, as the report suggests that free levels of CCL2 were suppressed [32]. In another study of carlumab in cancer patients, free levels of CCL2 were able to be suppressed when measured shortly after infusion, but as early as 7 days later were at or above baseline levels [33]. These data suggest that there is a large pool of CCL2 available for binding to anti-CCL2 antibodies, but that suppression of free CCL2 for prolonged periods did not occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…25 However, the therapy failed to effectively engage the desired target and pharmacokinetic data revealed a rapid dissociation of the antibody, resulting in an undesired increase in serum CCL2 concentrations. 26 In this current study, we utilized a CCR2 small molecule antagonist and it is feasible that by targeting the receptor we are able to overcome the limitations observed in these prior trials. Another potential obstacle of targeting the CCL2/CCR2 axis is illustrated by studies demonstrating that cessation of αCCL2 therapy resulted in increased pulmonary metastasis and decreased survival in a murine model of breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, clinical trials have reported limited to no therapeutic efficacy of the CCL2-neutralizing antibody CNTO888 either as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic and nonmetastatic cancer [20], [21], [22]. Studies have suggested that a lack of efficacy was mainly due to clearance of antibody and rapid dissociation of antibody-CCL2 complex in vivo , leading to rebound of CCL2 levels during the antibody treatment [23]. The majority of studies have involved interval injections of CCL2-blocking reagents (antibody or inhibitor).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%