2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7796(03)00015-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilizing Preisach models of hysteresis in the computation of three-phase transformer inrush currents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental and simulation studies of the influence of the residual magnetic flux on the value of inrush current are rarely published and selected results are given in [3,4,22,23]. In [3] and [4] lack a comparison of simulation results with experimental results, which do not allow to validate the models of hysteresis.…”
Section: Macroscopic Models Of Magnetic Hysteresismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental and simulation studies of the influence of the residual magnetic flux on the value of inrush current are rarely published and selected results are given in [3,4,22,23]. In [3] and [4] lack a comparison of simulation results with experimental results, which do not allow to validate the models of hysteresis.…”
Section: Macroscopic Models Of Magnetic Hysteresismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3] and [4] lack a comparison of simulation results with experimental results, which do not allow to validate the models of hysteresis. In [22] the simplified model of the transformer was used, which does not take into account classical eddy current losses and anomalous losses. In [23] the components of classical and anomalous losses are included and show relatively good agreement between the results of simulation and experiment.…”
Section: Macroscopic Models Of Magnetic Hysteresismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental and simulation studies of the influence of the residual magnetic flux on the value of inrush current are rarely published and selected results are given in [2], [3], [7], [12]. In the papers [2], [3] lack a comparison of simulation results with experimental results, which do not allow to validate the models of hysteresis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the papers [2], [3] lack a comparison of simulation results with experimental results, which do not allow to validate the models of hysteresis. In [12] the simplified model of the transformer was used, which does not take into account classical eddy current losses and anomalous losses. In [7], the components of classical and anomalous losses are included and show relatively good agreement between the results of simulation and experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the approaches are based on the electrical equivalent circuit [5,[7][8][9] or magnetic equivalent circuit [10][11][12][13]. The sympathetic inrush current has also been analyzed in a few references [14][15][16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%