2022
DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2096239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilizing Primary Care to Engage Patients on Opioids in a Psychological Intervention for Chronic Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may suggest that among those with an opioid prescription, those with daily use or higher dosages are not necessarily less interested in psychological treatments. This was supported by other work that suggested that the dose of opioids was not associated with enrollment in a study examining a psychological intervention for pain management 39 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may suggest that among those with an opioid prescription, those with daily use or higher dosages are not necessarily less interested in psychological treatments. This was supported by other work that suggested that the dose of opioids was not associated with enrollment in a study examining a psychological intervention for pain management 39 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This was supported by other work that suggested that the dose of opioids was not associated with enrollment in a study examining a psychological intervention for pain management. 39 There are several limitations to note. First, this study measured patient interest in receiving psychological treatment for pain with a single item and did not measure actual engagement in a psychological intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 1 , the 39 studies used a broad range of research designs; nineteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [ 2 , 7 , 29 , 30 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ], eighteen non-randomized observational studies (e.g., prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case studies, quasi-experimental studies) [ 1 , 3 , 5 , 10 , 14 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ], and two secondary analyses of RCTs [ 66 , 67 ] met the inclusion criteria. The final 39 articles were tabled and analyzed according to the level of hierarchy ( Table 1 below and supplementary material Table S1 : Characteristics of Included Studies).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-three [85%, 33/39] studies reported the mean age (54.5 years old) [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 7 , 14 , 29 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 ] and six [15%, 6/39] studies did not report mean age [ 5 , 10 , 30 , 39 , 53 , 63 ]. Thirty-nine [100%, 39/39] studies provided the biological sex of the study participants and the percentage of females ranged from 9.2% [ 50 ] to 100% [ 66 ]. Twenty-eight [72%, 28/39] studies reported race and ethnicity characteristics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation