2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02812-0_86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilizing Secondary Input from Passive Brain-Computer Interfaces for Enhancing Human-Machine Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It also summarizes the behavior of the different groups, by displaying the metaspelling accuracy corresponding to the whole group, the low specificity group and the high specificity group, respectively. For those three groups, it further emphasizes the boundaries given by (3), that is, the minimum required trade-off between specificity and sensitivity. Precisely, given the observed GCR and spelling accuracy (in the absence of any correction) for each group, each boundary represents the limit above which the automatic correction becomes fruitful.…”
Section: Performance In Automatic Errormentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It also summarizes the behavior of the different groups, by displaying the metaspelling accuracy corresponding to the whole group, the low specificity group and the high specificity group, respectively. For those three groups, it further emphasizes the boundaries given by (3), that is, the minimum required trade-off between specificity and sensitivity. Precisely, given the observed GCR and spelling accuracy (in the absence of any correction) for each group, each boundary represents the limit above which the automatic correction becomes fruitful.…”
Section: Performance In Automatic Errormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this context, it is highly relevant to look for a way to detect and correct errors. One way to tackle this issue is to appeal to the hybrid BCI approach [2], where it has been shown that BCI performance could be improved by supplementing the firstorder brain signal with second-level information to aid the primary classifier and to improve the final decision or BCI output [3]. This complementary signal can be either of a cerebral origin or of a very different nature [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, such changes can be used to monitor the success of motor-learning and the impact of therapy on the patient. The detectability of different aspects of cognitive user state, like cognitive load [37], perception of errors [38], the perceived loss of control [39], and vigilance [40], has already been shown in general human-machine systems [41], and may find applications in human-robot interaction for stroke rehabilitation. For example, this information could be fed back to the user via neurofeedback to induce mental states beneficial to successful motor learning.…”
Section: Cognitive Monitoring During Patient-robot Interactionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, passive BCIs are based on "reactive states of the user's cognition automatically induced while interacting in the surrounding system" [44]. Passive inputs assess user state and use that to help control interaction without direct or intentional effort from the user.…”
Section: Passive Brain-computer Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%